
According to a survey of apartment
companies conducted by the National Multi Housing Council (NMHC), 66
percent of lessor respondents required renters insurance, which is up
from 44 percent in 2009, and in 2008 only 24 percent required the
insurance.
There are a variety of reasons why apartment companies are beginning
to implement renters insurance more, the most important benefit being
the owner’s ability to recover damages. If a resident happens to damage
the property the apartment company’s master insurance may cover the
cost, but there’s the possibility of a deductible and raised rates.
With renters insurance the landlord would simply recover the costs from
the resident’s insurance company. Landlords are also protected in the
event that there is a theft or loss that a tenant blames on the property
owner.
Coverage under a renters insurance policy usually covers damage
caused by smoke, fire, explosions, and water. The typical policy has
three fundamental components of coverage: Liability coverage, personal
possession coverage and external living expenses coverage.
Although landlords are increasingly electing to require tenants to
carry renters insurance, there are often state statutory limits on the
amount of control a lessor can exercise over the resulting insurance
purchase transaction. Under most states’ laws, apartment companies are
not allowed to require residents
to use a particular insurance company. However, the landlords are
allowed to provide a list of insurance companies as an option to
residents. Indeed, landlords may identify favored insurance companies
with which they have agreements for lower rates and pre-approval. Such
arrangements offer incentives for both the landlord and tenant.
As the requirement of renters insurance becomes more common in the
apartment marketplace, there appears to be little push back by renters.
In fact, it is reported now that residents have begun to not only
accept, but almost expect the requirement.